Should Le Corbusier’s E.1027 murals be considered as “historical monuments”? Cailliau, Agnès, 1951-
Rating
[Loading...]
??%...x ratedReaders
Rate the title:
LDR -----naa a22------i 4500 001 001010001324413 003 CZ-PrNPU 005 20240104135042.9 008 230119s2019----po------------------eng-d 040 $aABE320$bcze$erda 072 7 $a72$xArchitektura$2Konspekt$921 072 7 $a79$xRekreace. Volný čas. Zábava. Hry. Sport$2Konspekt$920 100 1 $aCailliau, Agnès,$d1951-$4aut 245 10 $aShould Le Corbusier’s E.1027 murals be considered as “historical monuments”? /$cAgnès Cailliau 300 $a5 stran :$bilustrace 336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent 337 $abez média$bn$2rdamedia 338 $asvazek$bnc$2rdacarrier 520 2 $aLe Corbusier’s murals in E.1027, the famous house designed by Eileen Gray, have been maintained and restored as “historical monuments”. I subscribe to a different view, and shall express it from three perspectives: • a legal and administrative dimension: only Eileen Gray’s E.1027 is designated a Historical Monument. The murals are not covered by this classification. • an artistic point of view: Le Corbusier’s murals are detrimental to the original state of the architectural work and to the spirit of the house, they are discordant. The murals, by their mere presence, endanger the architectural work. a physical/technical angle: Le Corbusier’s murals themselves are in physical danger. 600 07 $aLe Corbusier,$d1887-1965$7jn19981001733$2czenas 650 07 $amoderní architektura$7ph115339$2czenas 650 07 $amodernismus$7ph122934$2czenas 650 07 $abydlení$7ph114212$2czenas 650 07 $anástěnná malba$7ph115508$2czenas 651 7 $aFrancie$7ge129152$2czenas 655 7 $ačlánky$7fd133976$2czenas 773 0 $w1193962$tDocomomo journal :$x1380-3204$gRočník 60 (2019), strana 84–88$q60$92019 856 42 $uhttps://docomomojournal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/345/97$yČlánek v elektronické podobě 910 $aABE320$trs 997 $tAN
